刘力铭,匡恺

• 1:清华大学新闻与传播学院

摘要(Abstract)：

在生成式人工智能深度介入传播实践的背景下，人机交互已演化为复杂的共生关系，传统以人为中心的能动性概念正面临新的理论挑战。本研究梳理了能动性在传播学领域的引入与演化脉络，立足关系取向的视角，重构了人机传播语境下能动性在不同层面的四条概念路径：个体层面、人机交互层面、组织与系统层面、话语层面。本研究进一步探讨了能动性概念的重构如何在“人机共同体”框架中得以延展，揭示传播中意义的生成，并推动能动性研究与人机传播理论的深入对话。

关键词(KeyWords)： 人机传播;能动性;机器能动性;概念综述

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 刘力铭,匡恺

参考文献(References)：

• 常江、刘松吟(2024):后人类新闻：内涵、认识论与能动现实主义，《当代传播》,第5期，11-16页。
• 陈明宽(2018):外在化的技术物体与技术物体的个性化——论斯蒂格勒技术哲学的内在张力，《科学技术哲学研究》,第35卷第3期，63-69页。
• Kim,J.、Etzrodt,K.、Prahl,A.、Edwards,C.(2024):与机器交流：人机传播领域的未来轨迹，《全球传媒学刊》,第11卷第1期，71-105页。
• 刘扬(2025年3月12日):2025会是AI智能体爆发元年吗?多位人工智能领域专家解读，获取自https://china.huanqiu.com/article/4Lp8Sgb5ir3
• 同雪莉、宋佳荣(2024):主体性与控制力：人机关系的深描与重塑——基于87例青年断网实践的现实考察，《中国青年研究》,第10期，58-66页。
• 徐琦(2023):超越“计算机为社会行动者”范式：智媒时代人机传播理论创新的突破点，《现代传播》,第45卷第6期，160-168页。
• 易前良(2025):机器何以成为传播者：人机传播研究范式及其理论拓展，《现代传播》,第47卷第4期，1-9,27页。
• Albert,S.& Hall,L.(2024).Distributed agency in smart homecare interactions:A conversation analytic case study.Discourse & Communication,18(6),892-904.doi:10.1177/17504813241267059.
• Anicker,F.,Fla??hoff,G.& Marcinkowski,F.(2024).The matrix of AI agency:On the demarcation problem in social theory.Sociological Theory,42(4),307-328.doi:10.1177/07352751241289925.
• Bandura,A.(2006).Toward a psychology of human agency.Perspectives on Psychological Science,1(2),164-180.
• Clinkenbeard,M.J.(2020).A posthuman approach to agency,disability,and technology in social interactions.Technical Communication Quarterly,29(2),115-135.doi:10.1080/10572252.2019.1646319.
• Cornelio,P.,Haggard,P.,Hornbaek,K.,Georgiou,O.,Bergstr??m,J.,Subramanian,S.& Obrist,M.(2022).The sense of agency in emerging technologies for human-computer integration:A review.Frontiers in Neuroscience,16,949138.doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.949138.
• Endacott,C.G.(2024).Enacting machine agency when AI makes one's day:Understanding how users relate to AI communication technologies for scheduling.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,29(4),zmae011.doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmae011.
• Gibbs,J.L.,Kirkwood,G.L.,Fang,C.Y.& Wilkenfeld,J.N.(2021).Negotiating agency and control:Theorizing human-machine communication from a structurational perspective.Human-Machine Communication,2,153-171.doi:10.30658/hmc.2.8.
• Giddens,A.(1984).The constitution of society:Outline of the theory of structuration.Berkeley:University of California Press.
• Greene,R.W.(2004).Rhetoric and capitalism:Rhetorical agency as communicative labor.Philosophy & Rhetoric,37(3),188-206.doi:10.1353/par.2004.0020.
• He,T.& Agur,C.(2025).The platformization of emotions:Managing affective labor in platform-mediated game work.New Media & Society.doi:10.1177/14614448251338512.
• IBM.(January 15,2025).AI agents in 2025:Expectations vs.reality.Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/cn-zh/think/insights/ai-agents-2025-expectations-vs-reality
• Inga,J.,Ruess,M.,Robens,J.H.,Nelius,T.,Rothfu??,S.,Kille,S.,Dahlinger,P.,Lindenmann,A.,Thomaschke,R.,Neumann,G.,Matthiesen,S.,Hohmann,S.& Kiesel,A.(2023).Human-machine symbiosis:A multivariate perspective for physically coupled human-machine systems.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,170,102926.doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102926.
• Jokinen,E.(2016).Precarious everyday agency.European Journal of Cultural Studies,19(1),85-99.doi:10.1177/1367549415585548.
• Kang,H.& Lou,C.(2022).AI agency vs.human agency:Understanding human-AI interactions on TikTok and their implications for user engagement.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,27(5),zmac014.doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmac014.
• Kim,M.G.& Lee,K.C.(2025).Proposing the “Digital Agenticity Theory” to analyze user engagement in conversational AI chatbot.Journal of Business Research,189,115162.doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115162.
• Kline,R.(2023).Cybernetics and information theory in human-machine commu-nication.In Guzman,A.L.,McEwen,R.& Jones,S.(Eds.),The Sage Handbook of Human-Machine Communication (pp.22-31).London:SAGE.doi:10.4135/9781529782783.n5.
• Krakowski,S.(2025).Human-AI agency in the age of generative AI.Information and Organization,35(1),100560.doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100560.
• Latour,V.B.(1996).On actor-network theory:A few clarifications.Soziale Welt,47(4),369-381.
• Lee,J.& Bissell,K.(2024).User agency-based versus machine agency-based misinformation interventions:The effects of commenting and AI fact-checking labeling on attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccination.New Media & Society,26(12),6817-6837.doi:10.1177/14614448231163228.
• Lüders,M.(2025).Experience machines for well-being?Understanding how social media entertainment matters for teens.Media,Culture & Society,47(1),154-170.DOI:10.1177/01634437241276122.
• Luhmann,N.(1995).Social systems.Stanford:Stanford University Press.(Luhmann,N.[1995].Soziale systeme:Grundri?? einer allgemeinen theorie.Frankfurt:Suhrkamp Verlag.)
• Markham,A.(2024).Algorithms as conversational partners:Looking at Google auto-predict through the lens of symbolic interaction.New Media & Society,26(9),5059-5080.doi:10.1177/14614448241251800.
• Morley,D.(1993).Active audience theory:Pendulums and pitfalls.Journal of Communication,43(4),13-19.doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01299.x.
• Nass,C.,Steuer,J.& Tauber,E.R.(1994,April).Computers are social actors.In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.72-78).Boston,MA,USA:ACM,doi:10.1145/191666.191703.
• O'Connor,T.(1995).Agents,causes,and events:Essays on indeterminism and free will.New York:Oxford University Press.
• Oliver,M.B.,Raney,A.A.,Slater,M.D.,Appel,M.,Hartmann,T.,Bartsch,A.,Schneider,F.M.,Janicke-Bowles,S.H.,Kr??mer,N.,Mares,M.L.,Vorderer,P.,Rieger,D.,Dale,K.R.& Das,E.(2018).Self-transcendent media experiences:Taking meaningful media to a higher level.Journal of Communication,68(2),380-389.doi:10.1093/joc/jqx020.
• Orlikowski,W.J.(2000).Using technology and constituting structures:A practice lens for studying technology in organizations.Organization Science,11(4),404-428.doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600.
• Pagliari,M.,Chambon,V.& Berberian,B.(2022).What is new with Artificial Intelligence?Human-agent interactions through the lens of social agency.Frontiers in Psychology,13,954444.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954444.
• Pan,W.J.,Liu,D.Y.,Meng,J.B.& Liu,H.L.(2025).Human-AI communication in initial encounters:How AI agency affects trust,liking,and chat quality evaluation.New Media & Society,27(10),5822-5847.doi:10.1177/14614448241259149.
• Pentzold,C.& Bischof,A.(2019).Making affordances real:Socio-material prefiguration,performed agency,and coordinated activities in human-robot communication.Social Media+Society,5(3),1-11.2056305119865472.doi:10.1177/2056305119865472.
• Pentzold,C.& Bischof,A.(2024).Achieving agency within imperfect automation:Working customers and self-service technologies.Convergence,30(3),956-974.doi:10.1177/13548565231174588.
• Ramage,M.& Shipp,K.(2009).Systems thinkers (pp.I-VII).London:Springer.
• Rammert,W.(2008).Where the action is:Distributed agency between humans,machines,and programs.In Seifert,U.,Kim,J.& Moore,A.(Eds.),Paradoxes of Interactivity:Perspectives for Media Theory,Human-Computer Interaction,and Artistic Investigations (pp.62-91).Bielefeld:Transcript Verlag.doi:10.14361/9783839408421-004.
• Saha??,A.,Desantis,A.,Grynszpan,O.,Pacherie,E.& Berberian,B.(2019).Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task:Comparing human and machine co-agents.Consciousness and Cognition,67,44-55.doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.008.
• Schatzki,T.R.(2025).Agency.Information and Organization,35(1),100553.doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100553.
• Schoeneborn,D.(2011).Organization as communication:A luhmannian perspective.Management Communication Quarterly,25(4),663-689.doi:10.1177/0893318911405622.
• Siles,I.,Gómez-Cruz,E.& Ricaurte,P.(2024).Fluid agency in relation to algorithms:Tensions,mediations,and transversalities.Convergence:The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies,30(3),1025-1040.doi:10.1177/13548565231174586.
• Suchman,L.A.(2007).Human-machine reconfigurations:Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
• Sundar,S.S.(2020).Rise of machine agency:A framework for studying the psychology of human-AI interaction (HAII).Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,25(1),74-88.doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmz026.
• van der Goot,M.J.& Etzrodt,K.(2023).Disentangling two fundamental paradigms in human-machine communication research:Media equation and media evocation.Human-Machine Communication,6,17-30.DOI:10.30658/hmc.6.2.
• Van Dijck,J.(2013).The culture of connectivity:A critical history of social media.New York:Oxford University Press.
• Watson,S.(2025).Observing the environment of technology.Systems Research and Behavioral Science,42(2),423-433.doi:10.1002/sres.3150.
• Wessels,B.(2013).Exploring human agency and digital systems:Services,personalization,and participation.Information,Communication & Society,16(10),1533-1552.doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.715666.
• Woodcock,J.(2021).The fight against platform capitalism:An inquiry into the global struggles of the gig economy (pp.127).London:University of Westminster Press.
• Xenitidou,M.& Gunnarsdóttir,K.(2019).The power of discourse:How agency is constructed and constituted in discourse of smart technologies,systems and associated developments.Discourse & Society,30(3),287-306.doi:10.1177/0957926519828031.
• Ytre-Arne,B.& Das,R.(2021).Audiences' communicative agency in a datafied age:Interpretative,relational and increasingly prospective.Communication Theory,31(4),779-797.doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa018.
• Zuboff,S.(2023).The age of surveillance capitalism.In Longhofer,W.& Winchester,D.(Eds.),Social Theory Re-Wired (3rd ed.,pp.203-213).New York:Routledge.