组织传播的蒙特利尔学派及其传播理论、范式与方法——访谈弗朗索瓦·库恩教授The Montreal School of Organizational Communication:Theory,Paradigm and Methodology——An Interview with Professor Fran??ois Cooren,a Key Figure of the School
杨颖,弗朗索瓦·库恩
摘要(Abstract)：
作为近往十余年来迅速崛起的一股学术力量，蒙特利尔学派推动了组织传播研究范式的重要变革，使传播从传统组织研究中的辅助性变量上升为组织生成与运行的核心机制。作为该学派的重要代表人物，曾任国际传播学会主席的蒙特利尔大学教授弗朗索瓦·库恩在本次访谈中，结合其长期学术研究，系统阐释了蒙特利尔学派的理论渊源、核心命题与方法论取向，重点论述了“传播构成论”、“文本能动性”、“文本-对话的协同定向”以及“传播腹语术”等关键概念，并就北美组织传播研究传统及人工智能语境下的传播学发展等话题进行了探讨。
关键词(KeyWords)： 组织传播;蒙特利尔学派;弗朗索瓦·库恩;传播构成论;传播腹语术
基金项目(Foundation): 国家留学基金委青年骨干教师出国研修项目(留基项[2024]54)的阶段性研究成果
作者(Author): 杨颖,弗朗索瓦·库恩
参考文献(References)：
- Ashcraft,K.L.(2021).Communication as constitutive transmission?An encounter with affect.Communication Theory,31(4),571-592.doi:10.1093/ct/qtz027.
- Austin,J.L.(1962).How to do things with words.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
- Cooren,F.(2004).Textual agency:How texts do things in organizational settings.Organization,11(3),373-393.doi:10.1177/1350508404041998.
- Cooren,F.(2010).Action and agency in dialogue:Passion,incarnation and ventriloquism.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Cooren,F.(2012).Communication theory at the center:Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality.Journal of Communication,62(1),1-20.doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x.
- Cooren,F.,Bencherki,N.,Chaput,M.& Vásquez,C.(2025).The communicative constitution of strategy-making:Exploring fleeting moments of strategy.In Golsorkhi,D.,Rouleau,L.,Seidl,D.& Vaara,E.(Eds.),Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (3rd ed.,pp.381-400).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- Fairhurst,G.T.(2007).Discursive leadership:In conversation with leadership psychology.Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications.
- Greimas,A.J.(1987).On meaning:Selected writings in semiotic theory (P.J.Perron & F.H.Collins,Trans.).Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
- Kuhn,T.(2008).A communicative theory of the firm:Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships.Organization Studies,29(8-9),1227-1254.doi:10.1177/0170840608094778.
- Latour,B.(1993).We have never been modern (C.Porter,Trans.).Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
- Latour,B.(1996).On interobjectivity.Mind,Culture,and Activity,3(4),228-245.doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2.
- Latour,B.(2005).Reassembling the social:An introduction to actor-network-theory.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
- Miller,K.(2015).Organizational communication:Approaches and process (7th ed.).Stamford,Connecticut:Cengage Learning.
- Newcomb,T.M.(1953).An approach to the study of communicative acts.Psychological Review,60(6),393-404.doi:10.1037/h0063098.
- Putnam,L.L.(2015).Unpacking the dialectic:Alternative views on the discourse-materiality relationship.Journal of Management Studies,52(5),706-716.doi:10.1111/joms.12115.
- Sacks,H.(1992).Lectures on conversation.Oxford:Blackwell.
- Searle,J.R.(1969).Speech acts:An essay in the philosophy of language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- Searle,J.R.(1979).Expression and meaning:Studies in the theory of speech acts.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- Taylor,J.R.(1993).Rethinking the theory of organizational communication:How to read an organization.Norwood:Ablex.
- Tompkins,P.K.(1967).Organizational communication:A state-of-the-art review.In Richetto,G.(Ed.),Conference on Organizational Communication (pp.4-26).National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
- Weick,K.E.(1979).The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.).New York:McGraw-Hill.
- Weick,K.E.(1995).Sensemaking in organizations.Thousand Oaks:Sage.