邓理峰

• 1:中山大学传播与设计学院

摘要(Abstract)：

被视为外行的普通民众，如何有序有效地参与具有知识垄断特征的公共讨论和决策，这一话题的实证研究至今仍颇为缺乏。福岛事故后，我国内陆核电争议中反核群体呈现出来的常民知识，是一种以实践理性为中心的知识体系，具有淡化科技理性、凸显社会理性和价值理性的特征。其知识来源是技术精英的核电异议，而传播和影响链则以互联网为主导，兼用政策内参和社交网络。反核常民知识最主要的影响是形塑了公众及决策者的认知结构、情感倾向和政策偏好。常民知识与专家知识在内容上是互补而非竞争的两类知识体系，可以把常民与专家之间基于知识的共识协商作为公众参与协商治理实践的一种策略和方法。

关键词(KeyWords)： 风险治理;常民知识;内陆核电争议;福岛核事故

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“深度媒介化环境里的核电风险沟通与协商治理研究”（项目批准号：20FXWB005）的阶段性研究成果

作者(Author): 邓理峰

DOI: 10.16602/j.gjms.20220014

参考文献(References)：

• 杜健勋(2016):交流与协商：邻避风险治理的规范性选择，《法学评论》,第1期，141-150页。
• 王亦楠(2018):环渤海地区建设核电站还须审慎决策，《中国经济周刊》,第43期，78-81页。
• 王锡锌、章永乐(2003):专家、大众与知识的运用：行政规则制定过程的一个分析框架，《中国社会科学》,第3期，113-127页。
• Beck,U.(1992).Risk society:Towards a new modernity.London:Sage.
• Carey,J.W.(1992).Communication as culture:Essays on media and society.London and New York:Routledge.
• Collins,J.W.(2010).Mobile phone masts,social rationalities and risk:Negotiating lay perspectives on technological hazards.Journal of Risk Research,13(5),621-637.doi:10.1080/13669870903305911.
• Couldry,N.& Hepp,A.(2017).The mediated construction of reality.Cambridge,UK:Polity Press.
• Dixon,J.E.,Dogan,R.& Sanderson,A.(2009).The situational logic of social actions.New York:Nova Science Publishers.
• Fairclough,N.(2001).Language and power.London and New York:Routledge.
• Fiorino,D.J.(1990).Citizen participation and environmental risk:A survey of institutional mechanisms.Science,Technology,& Human Values,15(2),226-243.doi:10.1177/016224399001500204.
• Flick,U.(1992).Triangulation revisited:Strategy of validation or alternative?.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,22(2),175-197.doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x.
• Flyvbjerg,B.(2001).Making social science matter:Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511810503.
• Foucault,M.(1980).Power/knowledge:Selected interviews and other writings,1972—1977.Brighton,UK:The Harvester Press.
• Gaventa,J.& Cornwall,A.(2006).Challenging the boundaries of the possible:Participation,knowledge and power.IDS Bulletin,37(6),122-128.doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00329.x.
• George,A.L.& Bennett,A.(2005).Case studies and theory development in the social sciences.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
• Greenwood,D.J.& Levin,M.(2007).Introduction to action research:Social research for social change (2nd ed.).Thousand Oak:Sage Publications.
• Habermas,J.(1984).The theory of communicative action,Vol.1:Reason and the rationalization of society.Boston,MA:Beacon Press.
• Healy,S.(2009).Toward an epistemology of public participation.Journal of Environmental Management,90(4),1644-1654.doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.020.
• Irwin,A.& Michael,M.(2003).Science,social theory and public knowledge.Maidenhead:Open University Press.
• Jasanoff,S.(2004).States of knowledge:The co-production of science and social order.New York:Routledge.
• Jensen,K.B.(2010).Media convergence:The three degrees of network,mass and interpersonal communication.London:Routledge.
• Renn,O.(2008).Risk governance:Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World.Netherlands:Springer.
• Leiss,W.(2001).In the chamber of risks:Understanding risk controversies.Montreal:McGill-Queen’s University Press.
• Lukes,S.(2005).Power:A radical view.New York:Palgrave.
• Lupton,D.(1999).Risk and sociocultural theory:New directions and perspectives.London:Cambridge University Press.
• Maguire,S.& Hardy,C.(2009).Discourse and deinstitutionalization:The decline of DDT.Academy of Management Journal,52(1),148-178.doi:10.5465/amj.2009.36461993.
• Miller,C.A.(2008).Civic epistemologies:Constituting knowledge and order in political communities.Sociology Compass,2(6),1896-1919.doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00175.x.
• Millgram,E.(2003).Varieties of practical reasoning.Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press.
• Nagel,J.(2014).Knowledge:A very short introduction.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
• Nelkin,D.(1975).The political impact of technical expertise.Social Studies of Science,5(1),35-54.doi:10.1177/030631277500500103.
• Nelkin,D.(1995).Selling science:How the press covers science and technology.New York:W.H.Freeman & Company.
• Pidgeon,N.,Kasperson,R.E.& Slovic,P.(2003).The social amplification of risk.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
• Porter,T.M.& Ross,D.(2003).The Cambridge history of science,Volume 7:The modern social sciences.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
• Sunstein,C.R.(2017).#Republic:Divided democracy in the age of social media.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
• Talisse,R.B.(2020).The epistemology of democracy:An overview.In Fricker,M.,Graham,P.J.,Henderson,& Pedersen,N.J.L.L.(Eds.),The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology (pp.357-366).New York:Routledge.
• Wynne,B.(1992).Misunderstood misunderstanding:Social identities and public uptake of science.Public Understanding of Science,1(3),281-304.doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004.
• Wynne,B.(1998).May the sheep safely graze?A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide.In Lash,S.,Szerszynski,B.& Wynneeds,B.(Eds.),Risk,environment and modernity:Towards a new ecology (pp.44-83).London:SAGE Publications.doi:10.4135/9781446221983.n3.
• ① 访谈：CGN-2013-2017。
• ② 访谈：BJ-201612-01、BJ-201712-01。
• ③ 访谈：CGN-2013-2017、SZ-201405-01、SZ-201405-02、BJ-201612-02。
• ④ 访谈：CGN-2013-2017、SZ-201405-01、BJ-201612-02等。
• ⑤ 访谈：CGN-2013-2017、SZ-201405-02、PZ-201708-01等。