龙子羽

• 1:美国科罗拉多州立大学
• 2:国际期刊Management Communication Quarterly

摘要(Abstract)：

本文对近年来组织传播学科的发展脉络和前沿议题进行系统性综述。文章梳理六大组织传播学主流理论视角和实证研究趋势，包括组织传播构成论、组织张力、批判性研究、去西方化理论建设以及多元实证研究范畴和方法等发展方向，并提出四个中国组织传播研究方向。组织传播学者可借鉴现有理论框架，着眼本土组织过程，致力于以理论发展为导向的实证研究，促进中国组织传播学长足发展。

关键词(KeyWords)： 组织传播学;本土化学科建设;传播构成论;组织张力;去西方理论建设

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 龙子羽

参考文献(References)：

• 胡银玉、胡河宁(2008):我国组织传播研究的发展历程——20年来组织传播研究综述(1988-2007),《今传媒》,第6期，36-37页。
• 帕翠斯·巴泽内尔(2023):观往而知来：亚太地区的媒介与传播研究，《全球传媒学刊》,第10卷第3期，191-198页。
• 汪炳华、周文慧 (2024):亚洲传播学研究的现状与未来，《全球传媒学刊》,第11卷第1期，163-172 页。
• 谢静(2014):《组织传播学》,上海：复旦大学出版社。
• Ashcraft,K.L.,Kuhn,T.R.& Cooren,F.(2009).Constitutional amendments:“Materializing” organizational communication.The Academy of Management Annals,3(1),1-64.doi:10.1080/19416520903047186.
• Askay,D.A.& Gossett,L.(2015).Concealing communities within the crowd:Hiding organizational identities and brokering member identifications of the Yelp Elite Squad.Management Communication Quarterly,29(4),616-641.doi:10.1177/0893318915597301.
• Ban,Z.(2018).Calibrating the tilted scale:(Re)constructing fairness in fair wage discourse.Journal of Applied Communication Research,46(4),409-428.doi:10.1080/00909882.2018.1498979.
• Barbour,J.B.& Gill,R.(2017).Questioning as regulatory work practice:The communicative accomplishment of reliability and safety in the oversight of nuclear power plants.Communication Monographs,84(4),466-487.doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1322212.
• Bean,H.& Buikema,R.J.(2015).Deconstituting al-Qa'ida:CCO theory and the decline and dissolution of hidden organizations.Management Communication Quarterly,29(4),512-538.doi:10.1177/0893318915597300.
• Broadfoot,K.J.& Munshi,D.(2007).Diverse voices and alternative rationalities:Imagining forms of postcolonial organizational communication.Management Communication Quarterly,21(2),249-267.doi:10.1177/0893318907306037.
• Brummans,B.H.J.M.,Cooren,F.,Robichaud,D.& Taylor,J.R.(2014).Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations.In Putnam,L.L.& Mumby,D.K.(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Communication:Advances in Theory,Research,and Methods (3rd ed.,pp.173-194).Thousand Oaks:Sage.
• Brummans,B.H.J.M.,Taylor,B.C.& Sivunen,A.(Eds.) (2024).The Sage handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication.Thousand Oaks:SAGE.
• Buzzanell,P.M.& Goldzwig,S.R.(1991).Linear and nonlinear career models:Metaphors,paradigms,and ideologies.Management Communication Quarterly,4(4),466-505.doi:10.1177/0893318991004004004.
• Buzzanell,P.M.(1994).Gaining a voice:Feminist organizational communication theorizing.Management Communication Quarterly,7(4),339-383.doi:10.1177/0893318994007004001.
• Buzzanell,P.M.(2010).Resilience:Talking,resisting,and imagining new normalcies into being.Journal of Communication,60(1),1-14.doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x.
• Buzzanell,P.M.(2018).Organizing resilience as adaptive-transformational tensions.Journal of Applied Communication Research,46(1),14-18.doi:10.1080/00909882.2018.1426711.
• Buzzanell,P.M.(2019).Communication theory of resilience in everyday talk,interactions,and network structures.In Wilson,S.R.& Smith,S.W.(Eds.),Reflections on Interpersonal Communication Research (pp.65-88).San Diego:Cognella.
• Cooper,K.R.(2021).“For everyone” means “For no one”:Membership tensions in community collaboration.Management Communication Quarterly,35(3),392-417.doi:10.1177/08933189211000324.
• Cooren,F.,Matte,F.,Benoit-Barné,C.& Brummans,B.H.J.M.(2013).Communication as ventriloquism:A grounded-in-action approach to the study of organizational tensions.Communication Monographs,80(3),255-277.doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.788255.
• Cruz,J.M.& Sodeke,C.U.(2021).Debunking eurocentrism in organizational communication theory:Marginality and liquidities in postcolonial contexts.Communication Theory,31(3),528-548.doi:10.1093/ct/qtz038.
• Dorrance Hall,E.& Gettings,P.E.(2020).“Who is this little girl they hired to work here?”:Women's experiences of marginalizing communication in male-dominated workplaces.Communication Monographs,87(4),484-505.doi:10.1080/03637751.2020.1758736.
• Dougherty,D.S.& Goldstein Hode,M.(2016).Binary logics and the discursive interpretation of organizational policy:Making meaning of sexual harassment policy.Human Relations,69(8),1729-1755.doi:10.1177/0018726715624956.
• Dougherty,D.S.& Okafor,B.(2024).Critical discourse analysis in qualitative organizational communication research.In Brummans,B.H.J.M.,Taylor,B.C.& Sivunen,A.(Eds.),The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Organizational Communication (pp.492-510).Thousand Oaks:Sage.
• Dutta,M.& Pal,M.(2010).Dialog theory in marginalized settings:A subaltern studies approach.Communication Theory,20(4),363-386.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01367.x.
• Eisenberg,E.M.,Trethewey,A.,LeGreco,M.& Goodall H.L.Jr.(2024).Organizational communication:Striking a balance between creativity and constraint (9th ed.).Gainesville:University of South Florida Press.
• Elers,P.,Dutta,M.J.& Elers,S.(2021).Engagement and the nonprofit organization:Voices from the margins.Management Communication Quarterly,35(3),368-391.doi:10.1177/08933189211001883.
• Fairhurst,G.T.& Putnam,L.L.(2024).Performing organizational paradoxes.New York:Routledge.
• Fang,C.Y.,Wilkenfeld,J.N.,Navick,N.& Gibbs,J.L.(2023).“AI am here to represent you”:Understanding how institutional logics shape attitudes toward intelligent technologies in legal work.Management Communication Quarterly,37(4),941-970.doi:10.1177/08933189231158282.
• Ferguson,M.W.& Dougherty,D.S.(2022).The paradox of the black professional:Whitewashing blackness through professionalism.Management Communication Quarterly,36(1),3-29.doi:10.1177/08933189211019751.
• Foot,K.,Sworn,H.& Alejano-Steele,A.(2021).An outcome-centered comparative analysis of counter-human trafficking coalitions in the Global South.Management Communication Quarterly,35(3),418-444.doi:10.1177/08933189211017925.
• Fu,J.S.,Cooper,K.R.& Shumate,M.(2019).Use and affordances of ICTs in interorganizational collaboration:An exploratory study of ICTs in nonprofit partnerships.Management Communication Quarterly,33(2),219-237.doi:10.1177/0893318918824041.
• Ganesh,S.,Zoller,H.& Cheney,G.(2005).Transforming resistance,broadening our boundaries:Critical organizational communication meets globalization from below.Communication Monographs,72(2),169-191.doi:10.1080/03637750500111872.
• Ganesh,S.,Stohl,C.& James,S.(2024).Hybridity,visibility,and organizing:Globalization and qualitative methods in organizational communication research.In Brummans,B.H.J.M.,Taylor,B.C.& Sivunen,A.(Eds.),The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Organizational Communication (pp.607-624).Thousand Oaks:Sage.
• Gist-Mackey,A.N.& Dougherty,D.S.(2021).Sociomaterial struggle:An ethnographic analysis of power,discourse,and materiality in a working class unemployment support organization.Communication Monographs,88(3),306-329.doi:10.1080/03637751.2020.1818801.
• Guzman,A.L.& Lewis,S.C.(2020).Artificial intelligence and communication:A human-machine communication research agenda.New Media & Society,22(1),70-86.doi:10.1177/1461444819858691.
• Hintz,E.A.,Betts,T.& Buzzanell,P.M.(2023).Caring for patients without Personal Protective Equipment (PPE):Material conditions as multidimensional cascading triggers for resilience processes.Health Communication,38(2),371-380.doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1953727.
• Hoerl,K.& Ortiz,E.(2015).Organizational secrecy and the FBI's COINTELPRO-Black Nationalist Hate Groups Program,1967—1971.Management Commu-nication Quarterly,29(4),590-615.doi:10.1177/0893318915597302.
• Jahn,L.S.J.& Myers,K.K.(2024).From mixed methods to mixed research approaches for qualitative organizational communication research.In Brummans,B.H.J.M.,Taylor,B.C.,& Sivunen,A.(Eds.),The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Organizational Communication (pp.3-22).Thousand Oaks:Sage.
• Jensen,P.R.& Meisenbach,R.J.(2015).Alternative organizing and (in)visibility:Managing tensions of transparency and autonomy in a nonprofit organization.Management Communication Quarterly,29(4),564-589.doi:10.1177/0893318915600577.
• Kang,D.J.,Jia,M.Y.& Ju,R.(2016).The expanding territory of organizational communication in China.Chinese Journal of Communication,9(3),232-263.doi:10.1080/17544750.2016.1202292.
• Kang,D.J.& Long,Z.Y.(2024).Organizing as Tong (通):Decolonizing organizational communication from the roots.Management Communication Quarterly,38(3),595-622.doi:10.1177/08933189231223424.
• Kim,M.,Kwestel,M.,Youn,H.,Quow,J.& Doerfel,M.L.(2022).Serving the vulnerable while being vulnerable:Organizing resilience in a social welfare sector.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,51(2),279-300.doi:10.1177/08997640211013912.
• Kuang,K.,Wilson,S.R.,Betts,T.,Boumis,J.K.,Hintz,E.A.,DeBeck,D.& Buzzanell,P.M.(2023).A longitudinal analysis of involuntary job loss and communication resilience processes during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of Communication,73(4),382-397.doi:10.1093/joc/jqad004.
• Lair,D.J.,Shenoy,S.,McClellan,J.G.& McGuire,T.(2008).The politics of meaning/ful work:Navigating the tensions of narcissism and condescension while finding meaning in work.Management Communication Quarterly,22(1),172-180.doi:10.1177/0893318908318263.
• Larson,E.W.,Linabary,J.R.& Long,Z.Y.(2022).Communicating inclusion:A review and research agenda on inclusion research in organizational communication.Annals of the International Communication Association,46(2),63-90.doi:10.1080/23808985.2022.2069045.
• Lewis,L.(2021).Afterward:Communication dynamics of nonprofit and voluntary organizations.Management Communication Quarterly,35(3),461-465.doi:10.1177/08933189211017922.
• Linabary,J.R.& Hamel,S.A.(2015).At the heart of feminist transnational organizing:Exploring postcolonial reflexivity in organizational practice at World Pulse.Journal of International and Intercultural Communication,8(3),237-248.doi:10.1080/17513057.2015.1057909.
• Linabary,J.R.,Cruz,J.M.,Allen,B.J.,Chalupa,J.A.,Dempsey,S.E.,Glenn,C.L.,Harris,K.L.,Long,Z.Y.,McDonald,J.,Musleh,S.,Oktaviani,F.H.,Parker,P.S.& Sobande,F.(2021).Envisioning more equitable and just futures:Feminist organizational communication in theory and praxis.Management Communication Quarterly,35(1),142-168.doi:10.1177/0893318920973598.
• Long,Z.Y.,Buzzanell,P.M.& Kuang,K.(2016).Positioning work amid discontinuities and continuities:Chinese Post80s workers' dialogical constructions of meanings of work.Management Communication Quarterly,30(4),532-556.doi:10.1177/0893318916636237.
• Long,Z.Y.& Buzzanell,P.M.(2022).Constituting intersectional politics of reinscription:Women entrepreneurs' resistance practices in China,Denmark,and the United States.Management Communication Quarterly,36(2),207-234.doi:10.1177/08933189211030246.
• Long,Z.Y.(2024).Book review:The Sage handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication.Management Communication Quarterly.doi:10.1177/08933189241245129.
• McAllum,K.(2020).Delegation-based and directive mentoring relationships in high reliability organizations:Negotiating the reliability-resilience tension in ambulance work.Communication Monographs,87(2),200-222.doi:10.1080/03637751.2019.1677926.
• Miller,K.& Barbour,J.(2015).Organizational communication:Approaches and processes (7th ed.).Boston:Cengage Learning.
• Miller,V.D.,Poole,M.S.,Seibold,D.R.,Myers,K.K.,Park,H.S.,Monge,P.,Fulk,J.,Frank,L.B.,Margolin,D.B.,Schultz,C.M.,Shen,C.H.,Weber,M.,Lee,S.& Shumate,M.(2011).Advancing research in organizational communication through quantitative methodology.Management Communication Quarterly,25(1),4-58.doi:10.1177/0893318910390193.
• Miller,V.D.& Poole,M.S.(Eds.) (2024).Organizational communication theory and research.New York:De Gruyter Mouton.
• Nicotera,A.M.(Ed.).(2020).Origins and traditions of organizational communication:A comprehensive introduction to the field.New York:Routledge.
• Pal,M.,Kim,H.,Harris,K.L.,Long,Z.Y.,Linabary,J.,Wilhoit Larson,E.,Jensen,P.R.,Gist-Mackey,A.N.,McDonald,J.,Nieto-Fernandez,B.,Jiang,J.,Misra,S.& Dempsey,S.E.(2022).Decolonizing organizational communication.Management Communication Quarterly,36(3),547-577.doi:10.1177/08933189221090255.
• Peterson,B.L.& McNamee,L.G.(2021).Special issue introduction on nonprofit and voluntary organizations:Questions and possibilities for the next era.Management Communication Quarterly,35(3),335-340.doi:10.1177/08933189211017535.
• Putnam,L.L.& Mumby,D.K.(Eds.) (2014).The Sage handbook of organizational communication (3rd ed.).Thousand Oaks:Sage.
• Putnam,L.L.,Fairhurst,G.T.& Banghart,S.(2016).Contradictions,dialectics,and paradoxes in organizations:A constitutive approach.The Academy of Management Annals,10(1),65-171.doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421.
• Redding,W.C.(1985).Stumbling toward an identity:The emergence of organizational communication as a field of study.In McPhee,R.D.& Tompkins,P.K.(Eds.),Organizational Communication:Traditional Themes and New Directions (pp.15-54).Newbury Park:Sage.
• Rice,R.M.(2021).Feminist theory and interorganizational collaboration:An ethnographic study of gendered tension management.Communication Monographs,88(4),530-548.doi:10.1080/03637751.2021.1931703.
• Scott,C.R.(2015).Bringing hidden organizations out of the shadows:Introduction to the special issue.Management Communication Quarterly,29(4),503-511.doi:10.1177/0893318915596205.
• Shumate,M.,Atouba,Y.,Cooper,K.R.& Pilny,A.(2014).Two paths diverged:Examining the antecedents to social entrepreneurship.Management Communication Quarterly,28(3),404-421.doi:10.1177/0893318914538561.
• Suortti,C.& Sivunen,A.(2024).Communicative tensions in remote work during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Management Communication Quarterly,38(2),386-412.doi:10.1177/08933189231199052.
• Südkamp,C.M.& Dempsey,S.E.(2021).Resistant transparency and nonprofit labor:Challenging precarity in the Art + Museum wage transparency campaign.Management Communication Quarterly,35(3),341-367.doi:10.1177/0893318921993833.
• Tian,Z.Y.(2024).‘The balance is a forever moving one’:Chinese women entrepreneurs' politics of reinscription when encountering nonhuman agents of control.Journal of Applied Communication Research.doi:10.1080/00909882.2024.2348537.
• Tracy,S.J.(2019).Qualitative research methods:Collecting evidence,crafting analysis,communicating impact (2nd ed.).West Sussex:Wiley.
• Trethewey,A.& Ashcraft,K.L.(2004).Special issue introduction:Practicing disorganization:The development of applied perspectives on living with tension.Journal of Applied Communication Research,32(2),81-88.doi:10.1080/0090988042000210007.
• Tye-Williams,S.,Carbo,J.,D'Cruz,P.,Hollis,L.P.,Keashly,L.,Mattice,C.& Tracy,S.J.(2020).Exploring workplace bullying from diverse perspectives:A Journal of Applied Communication Research forum.Journal of Applied Communication Research,48(6),637-653.doi:10.1080/00909882.2020.1830148.
• Williams,E.A.,Donovan,J.,Giles,L.& McKelfresh,D.(2022).High reliability organizing through an extended crisis:A case study of a U.S.university during COVID-19.Journal of Applied Communication Research,50(6),655-672.doi:10.1080/00909882.2022.2141066.
• Wolfe,A.W.& Blithe,S.J.(2015).Managing image in a core-stigmatized organization:Concealment and revelation in Nevada's legal brothels.Management Communication Quarterly,29(4),539-563.doi:10.1177/0893318915596204.
• Woo,D.(2019).Reconceptualizing interorganizational collaborations as tensile structures:Implications of conveners' proactive tension management.Commu-nication Monographs,86(2),158-183.doi:10.1080/03637751.2018.1526389.
• Xu,Y.F.(2024).Envisioning a better world of human and technology:Theoretical and empirical considerations to connect communication scholarship to ethical technology design.Annals of the International Communication Association,48(1),1-16.doi:10.1080/23808985.2023.2255586.