宋爽,闫文捷

• 1:山东青年政治学院文化传播学院
• 2:北京师范大学新闻传播学院

摘要(Abstract)：

事实核查逐渐呈现出由记者主导、网络用户和人工智能共同参与的多元化特征，但开放核查主体之于我国事实核查新闻业发展的意义仍有待经验回应。本研究结合新闻内容与个人态度的一致程度，系统比较多元核查主体对公众新闻认知与行为趋向的潜在影响。为此我们实施了一项3(核查主体：新闻记者vs平台用户vs人工智能)×2(新闻内容倾向：支持vs反对)的线上混合实验(N=403)。结果显示，三类核查主体均能帮助人们识别假新闻，但记者提供的核查内容比人工智能核查更可信；公众转发假新闻与事实核查的意愿不因核查主体改变而变化；相比平台用户与人工智能，记者核查能够更有效地抑制公众因认同新闻内容而误信假新闻的倾向。本研究认为，事实核查新闻业中认知权威的构成有所扩展，作为新兴核查来源的网络用户与人工智能可被视为“未被识别的权威”。文章最后，我们在实践层面就多方核查者协同调适以提升我国事实核查体系韧性与效能作出了讨论。

关键词(KeyWords)： 事实核查;假新闻;新闻创新;平台用户;人工智能

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金一般项目“社交平台虚假信息治理模式比较研究”(项目批准号:21BXW065)的阶段性成果

作者(Author): 宋爽,闫文捷

参考文献(References)：

• 常江、罗雅琴(2023):数字新闻与开放生产：从实践创新到理念革新，《传媒观察》,第10期，5-15页。
• 陈阳、李宛真、张喆喆(2023):数字新闻消费与人机关系——一项关于阅读机器人新闻的在线实验，《新闻记者》,第8期，40-50,85页。
• 刘国强、张思雨(2023):算法失误会影响用户的使用意愿吗?——基于事实核查算法的实验研究，《新闻记者》,第10期，16-27页。
• 刘于思、闫文捷、周睿鸣(2023):让事实核查更受欢迎?采用群众举报和亲民话语纠正阴谋论的多重后果，《全球传媒学刊》,第10卷第3期，170-190页。
• 陆泓承(2024):AI写作财经评论能否匹配人类记者的专业度——基于HSM模型的在线实验分析，《国际新闻界》,第46卷第10期，27-48页。
• 潘文静、陈嘉翌、季江睿(2025):事实核查新闻的中国经验：澎湃明查的透明度实践与传播效果，《新闻记者》,第11期，65-79页。
• 魏星(2023年6月25日):《事实核查手册》,获取自https://sechub.in/view/2695946
• 向芬、杨肇祎(2023):全球新闻创新共同体：基于事实核查工作方式的比较研究，《新闻记者》,第2期，32-45页。
• 闫文捷、刘于思、周睿鸣(2023):事实核查：专业新闻生产者可为的创新实践——一项在线实验的启示，《新闻记者》,第2期，46-59页。
• 闫文捷、李振宇(2025):作为集体探究的事实核查：公众参与和素养宣导的力量，《国际新闻界》,第47卷第9期，6-26页。
• 游淳惠、金兼斌(2020):新媒体环境下科学知识对争议性科技态度的影响——以转基因为例，《国际新闻界》,第42卷第5期，81-98页。
• 郑佳雯(2020):开放的探索：事实核查实践与公共生活的相互依存——以“NJU核真录”为例，《新闻记者》,第8期，20-31页。
• 中国互联网络信息中心(2024):《第54次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》,获取自https://www.cnnic.cn/NMediaFile/2024/0911/MAIN1726017626560DHICK VFSM6.pdf
• 周子杰(2024):重新发现国家：一次拓展中国媒体信任概念的尝试，《国际新闻界》,第46卷第7期，28-53页。
• 朱鸿军、王涛(2025):“旧困未了，新愁又起”:AI时代主流媒体如何走出新系统性困境，《国际新闻界》,第47卷第9期，69-85页。
• Amazeen,M.A.,Vargo,C.J.& Hopp,T.(2019).Reinforcing attitudes in a gatewatching news era:Individual-level antecedents to sharing fact-checks on social media.Communication Monographs,86(1),112-132.doi:1080/03637 751.2018.1521984.
• Bartsch,A.,Neuberger,C.,Stark,B.,Karnowski,V.,Maurer,M.,Pentzold,C.,Quandt,T.,Quiring,O.& Schemer,C.(2025).Epistemic authority in the digital public sphere.An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda.Communication Theory,35(1),37-50.doi:10.1093/ct/qtae020.
• Chung,M.& Kim,N.(2021).When I learn the news is false:How fact-checking information stems the spread of fake news via third-person perception.Human Communication Research,47(1),1-24.doi:10.1093/hcr/hqaa010.
• Chung,M.(2024).Share to stop the harm:How social media metrics drive sharing of fact-checking messages via first-person perception.Mass Communication and Society,27(5),925-948.doi:10.1080/15205436.2023.2240302.
• Coddington,M.,Molyneux,L.& Lawrence,R.G.(2014).Fact checking the campaign:How political reporters use Twitter to set the record straight (or not).The International Journal of Press/Politics,19(4),391-409.doi:10.1177/1940161214540942.
• DeVerna,M.R.,Yan,H.Y.,Yang,K.C.& Menczer,F.(2024).Fact-checking information from large language models can decrease headline discernment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,121(50),e2322823121.doi:10.1073/pnas.2322823121.
• Graham,M.H.& Porter,E.V.(2025).Increasing demand for fact-checking.Political Communication,42(2),325-348.doi:10.1080/10584609.2024.2395859.
• Hameleers,M.& van der Meer,T.(2020).Fight or flight?Attributing responsibility in response to mixed congruent and incongruent partisan news in selective exposure media environments.Information,Communication & Society,23(9),1327-1352.doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566394.
• Hameleers,M.(2024).Why do social media users accept,doubt or resist corrective information?A qualitative analysis of comments in response to corrective information on social media.Journalism Studies,25(7),776-793.doi:10.1080/1461670X.2024.2340591.
• Hu,Y.,Chen,A.F.,Yang,Y.& Tong,T.(2024).Ethically motivated or emotionally charged?Examining relationships among moral norms,anticipated negative emotions,and laypeople's online misinformation correction intentions.Mass Communication and Society,27(5),1158-1187.doi:10.1080/15205436.2024.2324861.
• Jia,C.Y.& Lee,T.(2024).Journalistic interventions matter:Understanding how Americans perceive fact-checking labels.Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review,5(2),1-17.doi:10.37016/mr-2020-138.
• Lee,J.& Bissell,K.(2024).User agency-based versus machine agency-based misinformation interventions:The effects of commenting and AI fact-checking labeling on attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccination.New Media & Society,26(12),6817-6837.doi:10.1177/14614448231163228.
• Lin,H.,Lee,J.,Wang,Y.& Kim,Y.(2025).The corrective effect of fact-checking and hostile media perceptions:A three-way interaction model between social media news usage and political misperceptions.Digital Journalism,13(8),1461-1481.doi:10.1080/21670811.2024.2383889.
• Liu,X.Y.,Qi,L.,Wang,L.& Metzger,M.J.(2025).Checking the fact-checkers:The role of source type,perceived credibility,and individual differences in fact-checking effectiveness.Communication Research,52(6),719-746.doi:10.1177/00936502231206419.
• Metzger,M.J.,Flanagin,A.J.& Medders,R.B.(2010).Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online.Journal of Communication,60(3),413-439.doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.
• Metzger,M.J.& Flanagin,A.J.(2013).Credibility and trust of information in online environments:The use of cognitive heuristics.Journal of Pragmatics,59,210-220.doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012.
• Moon,W.K.,Chung,M.& Jones-Jang,S.M.(2023).How can we fight partisan biases in the COVID-19 pandemic?AI source labels on fact-checking messages reduce motivated reasoning.Mass Communication and Society,26(4),646-670.doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2097926.
• Ou,M.X.,Ho,S.S.& Wijaya,S.A.(2025).Harnessing AI to address misinformation on cultivated meat:The impact of Chatbot expertise and correction sidedness.Science Communication,47(6):859-896.doi:10.1177/10755470251315097.
• Pennycook,G.,Epstein,Z.,Mosleh,M.,Arechar,A.A.,Eckles,D.& Rand,D.G.(2021).Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.Nature,592(7855),590-595.doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2.
• Shin,J.& Thorson,K.(2017).Partisan selective sharing:The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media.Journal of Communication,67(2),233-255.doi:10.1111/jcom.12284.
• Sun,M.R.,Hu,W.C.& Wu,Y.(2024).Public perceptions and attitudes towards the application of artificial intelligence in journalism:From a China-based survey.Journalism Practice,18(3),548-570.doi:10.1080/17512786.2022.2055621.
• Sun,Y.Q.& Xie,J.(2026).Do heuristic cues affect misinformation sharing?Evidence from a meta-analysis.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,103(1),249-272.doi:10.1177/10776990241284597.
• Sundar,S.S.(2007).The MAIN model:A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility.In Metzger,M.J.& Flanagin,A.J.(Eds.),Digital Media and Learning (pp.73-100).Cambridge:MIT Press.
• Tandoc,E.C.,Ling,R.,Westlund,O.,Duffy,A.,Goh,D.& Wei,L.Z.(2018).Audiences' acts of authentication in the age of fake news:A conceptual framework.New Media & Society,20(8),2745-2763.doi:10.1177/1461444817731756.
• Tu,F.J.,Pan,Z.D.& Jia,X.L.(2023).Facts are hard to come by:Discerning and sharing factual information on social media.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,28(4),zmad021.doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmad021.
• Van Erkel,P.F.A.,Van Aelst,P.,Van Nieuwenborgh,J.,De Vreese,C.H.,Hameleers,M.& Hopmann,D.N.(2026).Combating disinformation with news literacy interventions:An experimental study on the framing effects of news literacy messages.The International Journal of Press/Politics,31(1),140-160.doi:10.1177/19401612241279534.
• Walter,N.,Brooks,J.J.,Saucier,C.J.& Suresh,S.(2021).Evaluating the impact of attempts to correct health misinformation on social media:A meta-analysis.Health Communication,36(13),1776-1784.doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553.
• Wang,Y.(2021).Debunking misinformation about genetically modified food safety on social media:Can heuristic cues mitigate biased assimilation?.Science Communication,43(4),460-485.doi:10.1177/10755470211022024.
• Wang,Y.(2024).Engaging with misinformation and misinformation corrective messages on social media:Examining the role of source cues,social endorsement cues,and prior attitudes.Atlantic Journal of Communication,32(4),499-511.doi:10.1080/15456870.2023.2291200.
• Westerwick,A.,Sude,D.,Robinson,M.& Knobloch-Westerwick,S.(2020).Peers versus pros:Confirmation bias in selective exposure to user-generated versus professional media messages and its consequences.Mass Communication and Society,23(4),510-536.doi:10.1080/15205436.2020.1721542.
• Xue,H.N.,Zhang,J.W.,Shen,C.H.& Wojcieszak,M.(2024).The majority of fact-checking labels in the United States are intense and this decreases engagement intention.Human Communication Research,50(4),530-544.doi:10.1093/hcr/hqae007.
• Yan,W.J.& Pan,Z.D.(2023).Believing and sharing false news on social media:The role of news presentation,epistemic motives,and deliberative thinking.Media Psychology,26(6),743-766.doi:10.1080/15213269.2023.2208363.
• Yu,W.T.,Shen,F.& Min,C.(2022).Correcting science misinformation in an authoritarian country:An experiment from China.Telematics and Informatics,66,101749.doi:10.1016/j.tele.2021.101749.
• Zamith,R.& Westlund,O.(2022).Digital journalism and epistemologies of news production.In Powers,M.(Ed.),Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.Oxford:Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190 228613.013.84.
• Zhao,A.& Naaman,M.(2023).Insights from a comparative study on the variety,velocity,veracity,and viability of crowdsourced and professional fact-checking services.Journal of Online Trust and Safety,2(1),1-24.doi:10.54501/jots.v2i1.118.
• Zou,W.X.& Tang,L.(2021).What do we believe in?Rumors and processing strategies during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.Public Understanding of Science,30(2),153-168.doi:10.1177/0963662520979459.