黄河,王芳菲

• 1:中国人民大学新闻学院
• 2:大连理工大学人文学院

摘要(Abstract)：

在全球气候治理议程深刻调整以及气候传播语境加速演变的背景下，传统气候传播框架面临“认知阻力”与“行动脱节”的双重困境。作为有效连接政策和公众、弥合知行鸿沟的一种路径，适应性框架顺应了全球气候治理的范式转型，并逐步形成以规避冲突为前提，以在地化的气候适应行动倡导与情绪调适为策略的传播体系。本研究剖析了传统气候传播框架的当代困境，继而在解析适应性框架的定义和特征的基础上，分析了适应性框架如何回应并满足气候治理的现实需求，最后探讨了其在中国发挥效能需做出的调适。

关键词(KeyWords)： 气候传播;气候治理;适应性框架

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 中国人民大学“双一流”建设马克思主义新闻观创新研究(项目批准号:MXG202402)的阶段性成果

作者(Author): 黄河,王芳菲

参考文献(References)：

• 蔡雯(2019):从当代西方新闻改革运动看职业观念转变——“建设性新闻”“方案新闻”“公共新闻”评析，《新闻与传播研究》,第26卷第S1期，60-70页。
• 曹志刚、孙秋云(2014):低碳城市社区：居民认知与居民参与——青岛社区居民调查，《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》,第34卷第6期，93-96页。
• 高文珺(2023):低碳文化促进低碳生活方式形成的路径机制——基于大中城市低碳生活方式调查，《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,第5期，109-121页。
• 胡玉坤、马玉荣(2023):全球气候治理中适应与减缓长期失衡的后果与前景，《环境社会学》,第2期，21-47,227页。
• 黄河、刘琳琳、杨小涵(2023):情感驱动的实践——城市居民绿色低碳行为促进机制的ARI模型检验，《全球传媒学刊》,第10卷第2期，60-86页。
• 黄河、刘琳琳、杨小涵、田宁欣(2025):信息接触与期望确认——城市居民垃圾分类持续参与意愿的促进机制研究，《新闻大学》,第7期，63-78,123页。
• 季乃礼、沈文瀚(2022):面子协商与阶段式传播：以天津市S社区垃圾分类政策传播为例，《上海行政学院学报》,第23卷第3期，62-72页。
• 刘自雄(2020):范式转换抑或东西合流?——探析欧美建设性新闻运动的理论身份与价值，《现代传播》,第42卷第11期，46-52,77页。
• 秦龙、赵永帅(2019):人类命运共同体理念对儒家文化基因的当代承继，《学术界》,第1期，12-20页。
• 邱鸿峰(2016):激发应对效能与自我效能：公众适应气候变化的风险传播治理，《国际新闻界》,第38卷第5期，88-103页。
• 史安斌、童桐(2021):习近平生态文明思想国际传播的图景与路径——以推特平台“2060碳中和”议题传播为例，《当代传播》,第4期，39-44页。
• 王斌、王锦屏(2014):信息获取、邻里交流与社区行动：一项关于社区居民媒介使用的探索性研究，《新闻与传播研究》,第21卷第12期，90-106,121页。
• 王积龙、钟原(2024):海平面上升之框架效应对公众减缓行为的影响，《当代传播》,第2期，89-94,100页。
• 杨建宇(2015):基于方案的新闻：一种建设性实践，《编辑之友》,第7期，67-70页。
• 曾繁旭、戴佳、王宇琦(2023):《面向中国公众的气候叙事：六类人群与叙事方案》,北京：清华大学新闻与传播学院气候传播与风险治理研究中心。
• 曾繁旭、张智鹏(2024):基于价值观的气候传播：中国Z世代价值观念与气候叙事探究，《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,第32卷第7期，27-44页。
• Armitage,D.,Berkes,F.,Dale,A.,Kocho-Schellenberg,E.& Patton,E.(2011).Co-management and the co-production of knowledge:Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic.Global Environmental Change,21(3),995-1004.doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006.
• Bayes,R.,Bolsen,T.& Druckman,J.N.(2023).A research agenda for climate change communication and public opinion:The role of scientific consensus messaging and beyond.Environmental Communication,17(1),16-34.doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1805343.
• Boas,I.,Chen,C.C.,Wiegel,H.& He,G.Z.(2020).The role of social media-led and governmental information in China's urban disaster risk response:The case of Xiamen.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,51,101905.doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101905.
• Borah,P.(2011).Conceptual issues in framing theory:A systematic examination of a decade's literature.Journal of Communication,61(2),246-263.doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x.
• Casaňas,C.G.(2021).Don't they understand climate science?Reflections in times of crisis in science and politics.Public Understanding of Science,30(8),947-961.doi:10.1177/09636625211011882.
• Chaffin,B.C.,Gosnell,H.& Cosens,B.A.(2014).A decade of adaptive governance scholarship:Synthesis and future directions.Ecology and Society,19(3),56.doi:10.5751/ES-06824-190356.
• Coleman,R.,Thorson,E.,Jimenez,C.& Vinton,K.(2024).Reaching science skeptics:How adaptive framing of climate change leads to positive responses via persuasion knowledge and perceived behavioral control.Communication Research,51(4),392-414.doi:10.1177/00936502221084925.
• Coleman,R.,Thorson,E.& Chen,W.Y.(2025).But is that mediator really the cause?An experiment manipulating persuasion knowledge as a mediator for how adaptive frames create positive responses to climate change news.Science Communication,47(6),828-858.doi:10.1177/10755470241310822.
• Duan,R.,Takahashi,B.& Zwickle,A.(2019).Abstract or concrete?The effect of climate change images on people's estimation of egocentric psychological distance.Public Understanding of Science,28(7),828-844.doi:10.1177/0963662519865982.
• Folke,C.,Hahn,T.,Olsson,P.& Norberg,J.(2005).Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems.Annual Review of Environment and Resources,30,441-473.doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
• Ford,J.D.& King,D.(2015).Coverage and framing of climate change adaptation in the media:A review of influential North American newspapers during 1993—2013.Environmental Science & Policy,48,137-146.doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.003.
• Friestad,M.& Wright,P.(1994).The persuasion knowledge model:How people cope with persuasion attempts.Journal of Consumer Research,21(1),1-31.doi:10.1086/209380.
• Guenther,L.,J??rges,S.,Mahl,D.& Brüggemann,M.(2024).Framing as a bridging concept for climate change communication:A systematic review based on 25 years of literature.Communication Research,51(4),367-391.doi:10.1177/00936502221137165.
• Halkier,B.(2017).Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective:Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims.Public Understanding of Science,26(1),40-54.doi:10.1177/0963662515596314.
• Hart,P.S.& Nisbet,E.C.(2012).Boomerang effects in science communication:How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies.Communication Research,39(6),701-723.doi:10.1177/0093650211416646.
• Ipsos.(2025).People and climate change.Paris:Ipsos.
• Kahan,D.M.(2015).Climate-science communication and the Measurement problem.Political Psychology,36(S1),1-43.doi:10.1111/pops.12244.
• Lewandowsky,S.,Ecker,U.K.H.& Cook,J.(2017).Beyond misinformation:Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,6(4),353-369.doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
• Lupia,A.,Allison,D.B.,Jamieson,K.H.,Heimberg,J.,Skipper,M.& Wolf,S.M.(2024).Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,121(11),e2319488121.doi:10.1073/pnas.2319488121.
• Maduneme,E.& Cohen,A.S.(2024).Solutions journalism stories boosts pro-environmental behavioral intentions through positive affect and collective efficacy beliefs.Environment and Behavior,56(3-4),244-275.doi:10.1177/00139165241286874.
• Maibach,E.,Cullen,H.,Placky,B.,Witte,J.& Gandy,J.(2022).Improving public understanding of climate change by supporting weathercasters.Nature Climate Change,12(8),694-695.doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01433-2.
• McCright,A.M.& Dunlap,R.E.(2011).Cool dudes:The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States.Global Environmental Change,21(4),1163-1172.doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
• McIntyre,K.& Gyldensted,C.(2017).Constructive journalism:An introduction and practical guide for applying positive psychology techniques to news production.The Journal of Media Innovations,4(2),20-34.doi:10.5617/jomi.v4i2.2403.
• Moser,S.C.(2010).Communicating climate change:History,challenges,process and future directions.WIREs Climate Change,1(1),31-53.doi:10.1002/wcc.11.
• Newman,T.P.,Nisbet,E.C.& Nisbet,M.C.(2018).Climate change,cultural cognition,and media effects:Worldviews drive news selectivity,biased processing,and polarized attitudes.Public Understanding of Science,27(8),985-1002.doi:10.1177/0963662518801170.
• Nisbet,M.C.& Mooney,C.(2007).Framing science.Science,316(5821),56.doi:10.1126/science.1142030.
• Nisbet,M.C.(2009).Communicating climate change:Why frames matter for public engagement.Environment:Science and Policy for Sustainable Development,51(2),12-23.doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23.
• Norgaard,K.M.(2011).Living in denial:Climate change,emotions,and everyday life (pp.11).Cambridge:MIT Press.
• Pahl-Wostl,C.(2009).A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes.Global Environmental Change,19(3),354-365.doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001.
• Pearce,W.,Holmberg,K.,Hellsten,I.& Nerlich,B.(2014).Climate change on Twitter:Topics,communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report.PLoS One,9(4),e94785.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094785.
• Peng,H.S.,Li,L.L.,Li,C.,Li,P.Z.,Xiao,X.& Zhong,S.E.(2025).Awe-inspiring environmental engagement:Unveiling the impact of awe on pro-environmental behavior in nature-based tourism destinations.Journal of Resources and Ecology,16(1),172-183.doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2025.01.016.
• Said,N.& W??lfl,V.(2025).Impact of constructive narratives about climate change on learned helplessness and motivation to engage in climate action.Environment and Behavior,57(1-2),75-117.doi:10.1177/00139165251315576.
• Thier,K.& Lin,T.(2022).How solutions journalism shapes support for collective climate change adaptation.Environmental Communication,16(8),1027-1045.doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2143842.
• Thorson,E.,Coleman,R.,Tham,S.M.,Chen,W.Y.& Glenn,A.(2025).Adapt and overcome:The impact of adaptive frames in news stories on climate change skeptics and acceptors.Journalism.0(0),1-20.doi:10.1177/14648849251320800.
• UNEP.(2023).Adaptation gap report 2023.Nairobi:United Nations Environment Programme.
• van Swol,L.M.,Bloomfield,E.F.,Chang,C.T.& Willes,S.(2022).Fostering climate change consensus:The role of intimacy in group discussions.Public Understanding of Science,31(1),103-118.doi:10.1177/09636625211020661.
• Williams,H.T.P.,McMurray,J.R.,Kurz,T.& Lambert,F.H.(2015).Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change.Global Environmental Change,32,126-138.doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006.
• Witte,K.,Meyer,G.& Martell,D.(2001).Effective health risk messages:A step-by-step guide (pp.23).Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
• Zeng,Z.X.,van Prooijen,J.W.,Guo,Y.Y.& van der Linden,S.(2025).The Gateway Belief Model:A pre-registered large-scale replication in China.Journal of Environmental Psychology,102,102542.doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102542.
• Zhou,W.J.& Huang,G.W.(2017).Chinese ecological discourse:A Confucian-Daoist inquiry.Journal of Multicultural Discourses,12(3),272-289.doi:10.1080/17447143.2017.1348505.