师文,陈昌凤

• 1:清华大学理学院地球系统科学系
• 2:清华大学新闻与传播学院

摘要(Abstract)：

人工智能技术深刻地嵌入媒体生产、分发、互动反馈的各个环节,与原有的行业理念和实践发生深度交互。本文基于2018年全球范围内的百余篇智能媒体的研究成果,提炼归纳出7个研究方向,即智能技术与职业新闻理念、用户与算法可信度、信息环境多样性、智能化技术参与互联网信息治理、算法与权力、算法机制与信息价值观、透明度与算法问责机制等,并对它们进行了分析和总结,从而探讨全球视野下智能媒体研究的宏观趋势,以期为国内学者提供借鉴。

关键词(KeyWords)： 智能媒体;算法;价值观;媒介伦理

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社科基金重大项目“智能时代的信息价值观引领研究”的阶段性成果,项目号:18ZDA307

作者(Author): 师文,陈昌凤

DOI: 10.16602/j.gmj.20190006

参考文献(References)：

• 常江(2018a):策略化逃避:门户新闻网站在人工智能时代的实践理念转型,《编辑之友》,第12期,58-64页。
• 常江(2018b):原子化未来:技术变迁对报纸编辑室文化的重塑,《编辑之友》,第10期,62-68页。
• 陈昌凤、霍婕(2018):权力迁移与关系重构:新闻媒体与社交平台的合作转型,《新闻与写作》,第4期,52-56页。
• 陈昌凤、师文(2018):智能化新闻核查技术:算法、逻辑与局限,《新闻大学》,第6期,42-49页。
• 仇筠茜、陈昌凤(2018a):黑箱:人工智能技术与新闻生产格局嬗变,《新闻界》,第1期,28-34页。
• 仇筠茜、陈昌凤(2018b):基于人工智能与算法新闻透明度的“黑箱”打开方式选择,《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,第51卷第5期,84-88页。
• 方师师(2018a):搜索引擎中的新闻呈现:从新闻等级到千人千搜,《新闻记者》,第12期,45-57页。
• 方师师(2018b):双强寡头平台新闻推荐算法机制研究,《传播与社会学刊》,第43期,103-122页。
• 胡翼青、朱晓颖(2018):人工智能的“幻影公众”——基于新闻从业者实证研究的考察,《中国出版》,第19期,15-21页。
• 李龙、支庭荣(2018):“算法反恐”:恐怖主义媒介化与人工智能应对,《现代传播》,第40卷第9期,13-18页。
• 刘知远、宋长河、杨成(2018):社交媒体平台谣言的早期自动检测,《全球传媒学刊》,第5卷第4期,65-80页。
• 吕新雨、赵月枝、吴畅畅、王维佳、洪宇、田雷、胡凌、熊节、余亮(2018):生存,还是毁灭——“人工智能时代数字化生存与人类传播的未来”圆桌对话,《新闻记者》,第6期,28-42页。
• 人民网(2018年3月16日a):今日头条发布3·15资讯打假报告:子女向父母辟谣效果显著,获取自http://media.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0316/c198102-29872709.html。
• 人民网(2018年3月16日b):今日头条披露反谣言技术路线图,获取自http://it.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0316/c196085-29872273.html。
• 尚帅(2018):传播的兴趣偏向和浑然不觉的符号暴力——基于《今日头条》的算法控制研究,《现代传播》,第40卷第10期,58-62页。
• 师文、陈昌凤(2018):社交分发与算法分发融合:信息传播新规则及其价值挑战,《当代传播》,第6期,31-33页。
• 新华网(2018年11月7日):全球首个“AI合成主播”在新华社上岗,获取自http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018-11/07/c_1123678126.htm。
• 徐偲骕、姚建华(2018):脸书是一个国家吗?——“Facebookistan”与社交媒体的国家化想象,《新闻记者》,第11期,15-25页。
• 喻丰、许丽颖(2018):如何做出道德的人工智能体?——心理学的视角,《全球传媒学刊》,第5卷第4期,24-42页。
• Ananny, M. & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973-989. doi: 10.1177/1461444816676645
• Anderson, J. & Rainie, L. (December 10, 2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of humans. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/12/10/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-humans/
• Bechmann, A. & Nielbo, K.L. (2018). Are we exposed to the same “News” in the news feed? An empirical analysis of filter bubbles as information similarity for Danish Facebook users. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 990-1002. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2018.1510741
• Bodó, B., Helberger, N., Eskens, S. & M?ller, J. (2018). Interested in diversity: The role of user attitudes, algorithmic feedback loops, and policy in news personalization. Digital Journalism. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2018.1521292
• Bond, S. (January 20, 2018). Facebook to prioritise news rated trustworthy by users. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/2d303634-fd65-11e7-9b32-d7d59aace167
• Caplan, R. & Boyd, D. (2018). Isomorphism through algorithms: Institutional dependencies in the case of facebook. Big Data & Society, 5(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951718757253
• Castells, M. (2013). Communication power (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Conforti, C., Pilehvar, M.T. & Collier, N. (2018). Towards automatic fake news detection: Cross-level stance detection in News Articles. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) (pp.40-49). Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics.
• Crain, M. (2018). The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification. New Media & Society, 20(1), 88-104. doi: 10.1177/1461444816657096
• Della Vedova, M.L., Tacchini, E., Moret, S., Ballarin, G., DiPierro, M. & de Alfaro, L. (2018). Automatic online fake news detection combining content and social signals. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT) (pp.272-279). Jyvaskyla, Finland: IEEE. doi: 10.23919/FRUCT.2018.8468301
• European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (December 18, 2018). Draft ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai_hleg_draft_ethics_guidelines_18_december.pdf
• Fink, K. (2018). Opening the government’s black boxes: Freedom of information and algorithmic accountability. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1453-1471. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1330418
• Finn, E. (2017). What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Fletcher, R. & Nielsen, R.K. (2018). Generalised scepticism: How people navigate news on social media. Information, Communication & Society. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1450887
• Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B. & Brosius, H. B. (2018). Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism, 19(5), 595-610. doi: 10.1177/1464884916641269
• Hanselowski, A., PVS, A., Schiller, B., Caspelherr, F., Chaudhuri, D., Meyer, C.M. & Gurevych, I. (2018). A retrospective analysis of the fake news challenge stance-detection task. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Santa Fe, NM, USA: COLING.
• Helberger, N., Karppinen, K. & D’Acunto, L. (2018). Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. Information, Communication & Society, 21(2), 191-207. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271900
• Hitlin, P. & Rainie, L. (January 16, 2019). Facebook algorithms and personal data. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2019/01/16/facebook-algorithms-and-personal-data/
• Jang, S.M., Geng, T.M., Li, J.Y.Q., Xia, R. F., Huang, C.T., Kim, H. & Tang, J.J. (2018). A computational approach for examining the roots and spreading patterns of fake news: Evolution tree analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.032
• Kemper, J. & Kolkman, D. (2018). Transparent to whom? No algorithmic accountability without a critical audience. Information, Communication & Society. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1477967
• Khater, S.R., Al-Sahlee, O.H., Daoud, D.M. & El-Seoud, M.S.A. (2018). Clickbait detection. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software and Information Engineering (pp.111-115). Cairo, Egypt: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3220267.3220287
• Lischka, J.A. (2018). Logics in social media news making: How social media editors marry the facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism. doi: 10.1177/1464884918788472
• M?ller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N. & van Es, B. (2018). Do not blame it on the algorithm: An empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 959-977. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076
• Nechushtai, E. & Lewis, S.C. (2019). What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043
• Pandey, S. & Kaur, G. (2018). Curious to click it?-Identifying clickbait using deep learning and evolutionary algorithm. In Proceedings of 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) (pp.1481-1487). Bangalore: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICACCI.2018.8554873
• Sarr, E.N., Sall, O. & Diallo, A. (2018). SnVera: A new algorithm for automation of fact-checking in web journalism context. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) (pp.342-348). Valencia: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/SNAMS.2018.8554696
• Shu, K., Bernard, H.R. & Liu, H. (2019). Studying fake news via network analysis: detection and mitigation. In Agarwal, N., Dokoohaki N. & Tokdemir, S. (Eds.), Emerging Research Challenges and Opportunities in Computational Social Network Analysis and Mining (pp.43-65). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94105-9_3
• Smith, A. (September 5, 2018). Many Facebook users don’t understand how the site’s news feed works. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/09/05/many-facebook-users-dont-understand-how-the-sites-news-feed-works/
• Smith, A. (November 16, 2018). Public attitudes toward computer algorithms. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/11/16/public-attitudes-toward-computer-algorithms/
• Tandoc, Jr.E.C. & Maitra, J. (2018). News organizations’ use of native videos on facebook: Tweaking the journalistic field one algorithm change at a time. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1679-1696. doi: 10.1177/1461444817702398
• Thurman, N., Moeller, J., Helberger, N. & Trilling, D. (2018). My friends, editors, algorithms, and I: Examining audience attitudes to news selection. Digital Journalism. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2018.1493936
• Tschiatschek, S., Singla, A., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Merchant, A. & Krause, A. (2018). Fake news detection in social networks via crowd signals. In Proceedings of Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (pp.517-524). Lyon, France: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. doi: 10.1145/3184558.3188722
• Vargo, C.J., Guo, L. & Amazeen, M.A. (2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028-2049. doi: 10.1177/1461444817712086
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559
• Waddell, T.F. (2018). A robot wrote this? How perceived machine authorship affects news credibility. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 236-255. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1384319
• Weber, M.S. & Kosterich, A. (2018). Coding the news: The role of computer code in filtering and distributing news. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 310-329. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1366865
• W?lker, A. & Powell, T.E. (2018). Algorithms in the newsroom? News readers’ perceived credibility and selection of automated journalism. Journalism. doi: 10.1177/1464884918757072
• Wu, S.Y., Tandoc, Jr.E.C. & Salmon, C.T. (2018). Journalism reconfigured: Assessing human-machine relations and the autonomous power of automation in news production. Journalism Studies. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1521299